Monthly backlink analysis + Top linking sites from the GSC Links report
GSC shows for free the links Google actually sees and actually counts. Most site owners only check Ahrefs or SEMrush and miss the truth — what Google really uses for ranking. I analyze Top linking sites monthly, flag toxic links, and prepare a disavow file when needed. ₪280/month.
Why GSC-based backlink analysis works better
- ✓ GSC only shows links Google actually indexed and counted — no noise from links third-party tools detected but Google ignores
- ✓ The Top linking sites report is free, more reliable than paid tools, and updates at Google's own pace
- ✓ Systematic monthly monitoring surfaces new toxic links (PBN, spam, hacked sites) before they hurt the ranking
- ✓ A disavow file based on GSC data alone is more effective than one based on Ahrefs — because it is exactly what Google sees
The GSC Links report has two halves. External covers incoming links from other sites. Internal covers links within your own site. The external section breaks into three tables: Top linked pages (which of your pages pull the most links), Top linking sites (which domains link to you), and Top linking text (the anchor text on those links).
Monthly analysis exports all three, compares against the previous month, and flags movement: new linking domains, domains that stopped linking, suspicious spikes where a single site suddenly produces 200 links in a week. Those flags are early warnings — you respond before damage shows up in ranking.
GSC differs from Ahrefs and SEMrush in a useful way. Paid tools track far more links, but Google ignores a chunk of them entirely. GSC reports only what Google actually counts toward your site. When the two tools disagree, GSC wins. And GSC is free, the data is official, and the source is not in dispute.
Monthly Top linking sites report
Full export of the top 1,000 linking domains plus dominant anchor text, prior-month comparison, and flags on suspicious changes.
Toxic link detection
Automatic scan of linking domains against known blacklists (PBN, spam, casino, pharma), with a risk score per domain.
Cross-check against external tools
Cross-reference with Ahrefs/SEMrush (if you have an account) to see where they show more data and what Google actually counts — the gap tells a story.
Disavow recommendations where needed
Disavow file prepared in Google's official format, only after proof that the links are damaging, and uploaded to the Disavow Tool.
How we work
- 1
Export + compare
At the start of every month — export Top linked pages, Top linking sites, Top linking text. Compare against the prior month, mark changes.
- 2
Toxicity check
Run new linking domains through blacklists, manual review of suspicious ones, classification by risk level.
- 3
Report + recommendations
Monthly report with a change summary, list of new positive links, and a list of links requiring action (disavow or site-owner outreach).
- 4
Apply actions
If disavow is needed — file prepared and uploaded to the Disavow Tool. If site-owner outreach is needed — outreach sent.
Monthly monitoring + report + actions
6-month minimum recommended. One-time analysis available at ₪450.
Get a custom quoteOr see all SEO packages →
FAQ
Does GSC show every link the site has?
No. GSC shows up to 1,000 linking domains and up to 1,000 linked pages — only those Google indexed. So if you have 50,000 links from 3,000 domains, you see the top 1,000. But those 1,000 are the most meaningful, and that is exactly what Google counts. Most sites do not even reach 1,000.
What is the difference between GSC and Ahrefs for links?
Ahrefs shows many more links (sometimes 3-5x more) because it crawls independently. But a large share of those links Google ignores (nofollow, already disavowed spam, deindexed sites). GSC shows fewer but real ones. The rule: for link-building strategy I look at Ahrefs; for identifying real problems I trust GSC.
When does it make sense to upload a disavow file?
Only when there is clear proof the links are hurting. A sharp ranking drop time-correlated with suspicious links appearing. A Manual Action for unnatural links spelled out in GSC. Without that level of proof, disavow can hurt more than it helps — disavowing a link Google was counting positively costs you trust signal. Disavow is a last resort, not a first move.
Let us help
Send a message describing what you need and we will reply with a quote and recommended next step within an hour during business hours.
Related
- SEO service · Search Console Google Search Console monitoring — see what is working be...
- GSC · Internal Links Internal link audit based on the GSC Links report
- GSC · Manual Action Recovery from a Google Manual Action
- GSC · Security Issues GSC Security Issues — hacked content and malware emergenc...
- SEO service · Performance audit Full audit of the GSC Performance report — 16 months of d...